It would be more useful if I could do cond (.Params.foo | default .Site.Params.foo) bar baz
instead of cond (not (not (.Params.foo | default .Site.Params.foo))) bar baz
. This would match the truthy semantics of if statements.
https://github.com/gohugoio/hugo/issues/5792
Also, you can reduce this:
{{ .Params.foo | default .Site.Params.foo }}
To this:
{{ .Param "foo" }}
https://gohugo.io/functions/param/
So your final expression would be:
{{ cond (.Param "foo" | not | not) "bar" "baz" }}
1 Like
I searched GH, but didn’t find that one. Thanks.
Thanks for the .Param and pipe tip! Good to know.
1 Like
Or even shorter, though it might be confusing when looking at your code at some point in the future…
{{ cond (.Param "foo" | not) "baz" "bar" }}
I don’t follow. The condition is opposite by only having one not func.
Right. I reversed “baz” and “bar” in the last example.
Ah, thanks. I was staring right at it.
This topic was automatically closed 2 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.