You’re welcome @guayom ! I agree 100% with your reasoning.
I would also like to see this workflow become an accepted and documented practice.
But it’s not me who decides what is considered a bug or not.
Have a nice weekend!
You’re welcome @guayom ! I agree 100% with your reasoning.
I would also like to see this workflow become an accepted and documented practice.
But it’s not me who decides what is considered a bug or not.
Have a nice weekend!
As a follow-up @alexandros and @guayom, please see the following proposal/feature request. Bear in mind that there are higher priorities being worked on the by the actual Hugo devs (i.e., not me), so take this as you will:
Hi @rdwatters, thanks for the follow up. I really like the proposal, and I’ve been thinking about it a lot these days.
Now, about the OP, I already sat down and I think I almost figured a way to solve this issue and get to do all that I need without recurring to the method I used before. Of course, I might have to make one or 2 more questions in the forum before getting it to work .
As soon as I’m finished with that, I’ll post my solution so all of us can take a look and maybe even document it as we wait for the new feature.
– EDIT –
I posted my new solution here: Handling taxonomies like a boss - update