# Feedback wanted: Nested sections: Content structure

**URL:** <https://discourse.gohugo.io/t/feedback-wanted-nested-sections-content-structure/6692>\
**Category:** dev\
**Created:** [May 23, 2017, 4:07pm UTC](https://discourse.gohugo.io/t/feedback-wanted-nested-sections-content-structure/6692 "2017-05-23T16:07:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bep](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/discourse.gohugo.io/bep/32/3332_2.png) [@bep](https://discourse.gohugo.io/u/bep)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2017, 7:10am UTC](https://discourse.gohugo.io/t/feedback-wanted-nested-sections-content-structure/6692/12 "2017-05-25T07:10:03Z")

</div>

> [@moorereason](#):
>
> It’s not intuitive and is too limiting.

- How is it limiting?
- How is it more intuitive to put a `metadata.toml` file with some configuration variables in it? Both need documentation, the “\_” is, I would say, easier to document than the TOML file. Not?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.gohugo.io/t/feedback-wanted-nested-sections-content-structure/6692)._
